Incontinence Pads vs Ultimate Printed Mixed Pack: which is safer?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. Rearz Ultimate Printed Mixed Pack carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 66/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core

Confidence

78%

PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials

Rearz Ultimate Printed Mixed Pack

Rearz

Ultimate Printed Mixed Pack

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cellulose/SAP core, plastic backsheet, waterproof layers

Confidence

45%

LikelyPFAS in waterproof coatings

PossibleSkin sensitizers in adhesives or fragrances

PossibleMicroplastics and plastic backsheet degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Rearz.
  • We flag PFAS in waterproof coatings, Skin sensitizers in adhesives or fragrances, Microplastics and plastic backsheet degradation and Allergic reaction to dyes or pigments in printed designs on the Rearz and not on the Eco By Naty.
  • The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Rearz is cellulose/SAP core, plastic backsheet, waterproof layers, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Rearz grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking