Incontinence Pads vs Bladder Control Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. Cardinal Health Bladder Control Pads carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Cardinal Health
Bladder Control Pads
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in waterproof backing coating (water-repellent coating treatment)
PossibleSuperabsorbent polymer (SAP) leachates and additives
ReportedSkin irritation and maceration from occlusive backing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Cardinal Health.
- We flag PFAS in waterproof backing coating (DWR treatment), Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) leachates and additives, Skin irritation and maceration from occlusive backing and Microplastic and film degradation over storage or use on the Cardinal Health and not on the Eco By Naty.
- The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Cardinal Health is Absorbent core with waterproof backing (likely polyethylene or polypropylene film; backing treatment unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Cardinal Health grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking