Men's Italian-Stretch Chino Pant vs Ralph Lauren Men's Tailored Fit Performance Pants: which is safer?
Banana Republic Men's Italian-Stretch Chino Pant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Banana Republic
Men's Italian-Stretch Chino Pant
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dye contamination and allergic sensitization
ReportedMicroplastic shedding from elastane
Polo Ralph Lauren
Ralph Lauren Men's Tailored Fit Performance Pants
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating finish
ReportedFormaldehyde-releasing resins (wrinkle-resist treatment)
PossibleAzo dyes and aromatic amine colorants
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dye contamination and allergic sensitization and Microplastic shedding from elastane on the Banana Republic and not on the Polo Ralph Lauren.
- We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Formaldehyde-releasing resins (wrinkle-resist treatment), Azo dyes and aromatic amine colorants and Degradation of coating and microplastic shedding on the Polo Ralph Lauren and not on the Banana Republic.
- The Banana Republic is cotton-elastane blend, no known durable water repellent finish where the Polo Ralph Lauren is polyester/cotton blend with DWR finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Banana Republic is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Polo Ralph Lauren grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wrinkle-free professional workwear, see the full ranking