BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs e.l.f. Glossy Lip Stain Power Mauves: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
ELF
e.l.f. Glossy Lip Stain Power Mauves
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
pigments, oils, waxes in liquid/gel lip stain base
Confidence
72%
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing preservatives
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
PossibleAllergic contact dermatitis from dyes or pigments
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the ELF.
- We flag Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components and Allergic contact dermatitis from dyes or pigments on the ELF and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the ELF is pigments, oils, waxes in liquid/gel lip stain base, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking