BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Liquid Matte Lipstick: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Huda Beauty
Liquid Matte Lipstick
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
liquid pigments, polymers, solvents in typical cosmetic formulation
Confidence
60%
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination
PossibleTalc or talc-derived matting agents
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Huda Beauty.
- We flag 1,4-dioxane contamination, Talc or talc-derived matting agents, Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers and Bacterial or fungal growth in applicator over time on the Huda Beauty and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Huda Beauty is liquid pigments, polymers, solvents in typical cosmetic formulation, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking