TRILENE BIG GAME vs Mastiff FC Fluorocarbon Line: which is safer?

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME is the clear pick. Shimano Mastiff FC Fluorocarbon Line carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

Berkley

TRILENE BIG GAME

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

monofilament nylon fishing line

Confidence

72%

LikelyUV degradation and embrittlement

PossibleMicroplastic release during use

Shimano Mastiff FC Fluorocarbon Line

Shimano

Mastiff FC Fluorocarbon Line

PFAS grade

Poor 30/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Fluorocarbon fishing line (PVDF or similar polyvinylidene fluoride)

Confidence

72%

LikelyPFAS inherent to material structure

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from line degradation

ReportedEnvironmental persistence and bioaccumulation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag UV degradation and embrittlement and Microplastic release during use on the Berkley and not on the Shimano.
  • We flag PFAS inherent to material structure, Microplastic shedding from line degradation, Environmental persistence and bioaccumulation and Coating embrittlement and loss of integrity on the Shimano and not on the Berkley.
  • The Berkley is monofilament nylon fishing line where the Shimano is Fluorocarbon fishing line (PVDF or similar polyvinylidene fluoride), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 55 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Berkley is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fishing line: see the full ranking