Metro Compact Umbrella vs Vortex 62 in Golf Umbrella: which is safer?
BLUNT Metro Compact Umbrella is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Blunt
Metro Compact Umbrella
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Polyester canopy with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating
Confidence
45%
PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating (non-PFAS-graded hazard tier)
PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet
ShedRain
Vortex 62 in Golf Umbrella
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Polyester canopy with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating treatment unspecified)
Confidence
45%
LikelyFluorochemical water-repellent coating (PFAS risk)
PossibleCoating degradation and particle shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in DWR coating (non-PFAS-graded hazard tier) and Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet on the Blunt and not on the ShedRain.
- We flag Fluorochemical DWR coating (PFAS risk) and Coating degradation and particle shedding on the ShedRain and not on the Blunt.
- The Blunt is Polyester canopy with durable water-repellent (DWR) coating where the ShedRain is Polyester canopy with water-repellent coating (DWR treatment unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More umbrellas, see the full ranking