Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL vs Baking Pan TOA-60BP: which is safer?
Breville Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Breville
Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Porcelain enamel coating on steel
Confidence
78%
PossibleEnamel chipping and steel exposure
Cuisinart
Baking Pan TOA-60BP
PFAS grade
Bad 15/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified
Confidence
45%
PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal decomposition / fume inhalation
LikelyNonstick coating degradation and flaking
PossibleAluminum substrate leaching
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Enamel chipping and steel exposure on the Breville and not on the Cuisinart.
- We flag PTFE thermal decomposition / fume inhalation, Nonstick coating degradation and flaking, Aluminum substrate leaching and Lack of transparency on food contact substance compliance on the Cuisinart and not on the Breville.
- The Breville is Porcelain enamel coating on steel where the Cuisinart is Nonstick coating, type unspecified, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Breville is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Cuisinart grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More toaster ovens, see the full ranking