Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL vs Baking Pan TOA-60BP: which is safer?
Breville Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Breville
Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Porcelain enamel coating on steel
Confidence
78%
PossibleEnamel chipping and steel exposure
Cuisinart
Baking Pan TOA-60BP
PFAS grade
Bad 15/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified
Confidence
45%
PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal decomposition / fume inhalation
LikelyNonstick coating degradation and flaking
PossibleAluminum substrate leaching
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Enamel chipping and steel exposure on the Breville and not on the Cuisinart.
- We flag PTFE thermal decomposition / fume inhalation, Nonstick coating degradation and flaking, Aluminum substrate leaching and Lack of transparency on food contact substance compliance on the Cuisinart and not on the Breville.
- The Breville is Porcelain enamel coating on steel where the Cuisinart is Nonstick coating, type unspecified, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Breville is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Cuisinart grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More toaster ovens: see the full ranking