Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL vs Chef's Classic Nonstick Toaster Oven Baking Pan: which is safer?
Breville Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Breville
Enamel Baking Pan for the Smart Oven BOV800XL
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Porcelain enamel coating on steel
Confidence
78%
PossibleEnamel chipping and steel exposure
Cuisinart
Chef's Classic Nonstick Toaster Oven Baking Pan
PFAS grade
Bad 15/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Nonstick coating (type unspecified)
Confidence
35%
PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (if coating is Teflon-type coating-based)
LikelyCoating degradation and microflaking
PossibleThermal shock and coating adhesion failure
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Enamel chipping and steel exposure on the Breville and not on the Cuisinart.
- We flag PTFE fume risk (if coating is PTFE-based), Coating degradation and microflaking and Thermal shock and coating adhesion failure on the Cuisinart and not on the Breville.
- The Breville is Porcelain enamel coating on steel where the Cuisinart is Nonstick coating (type unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Breville is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Cuisinart grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More toaster ovens: see the full ranking