BP1 Med Liquid Wax vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Maplus
BP1 Med Liquid Wax
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from solvent carriers
PossibleSkin and eye irritation from direct contact
PossibleRespiratory sensitization from repeated inhalation
Our pick
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from solvent carriers, Skin and eye irritation from direct contact, Respiratory sensitization from repeated inhalation and PFAS accumulation (water repellent additives) on the Maplus and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the Maplus.
- The Maplus is hydrocarbon wax blend, ski/snowboard base treatment where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking