Universal FLUORO RED vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is the clear pick. MAPLUS Universal FLUORO RED carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Maplus
Universal FLUORO RED
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFluorinated additives (PFAS precursors and direct PFAS)
PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) emission during application
PossibleSkin contact and residual handling
Our pick
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fluorinated additives (PFAS precursors and direct PFAS), Volatile organic compound (VOC) emission during application, Skin contact and residual handling and Environmental persistence (snowmelt and aquatic bioaccumulation) on the Maplus and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the Maplus.
- The Maplus is Ski/snowboard wax with fluorinated additives (product name indicates 'FLUORO') where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Star Ski Wax is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Maplus grade, at 40% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking