Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?
Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Brooks
Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Likelywater-repellent coating finish (likely fluorinated compounds, PFAS class)
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes
PossibleAzo dyes
Our pick
Reebok
Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR finish (likely fluorinated compounds, PFAS class), Formaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes and Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding on the Brooks and not on the Reebok.
- We flag Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing and Elastomer degradation (spandex breakdown) on the Reebok and not on the Brooks.
- Both carry a flag for Azo dyes, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Brooks is nylon, elastane, polyester with DWR finish where the Reebok is nylon, spandex, cotton blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Reebok is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Brooks grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sports performance undergarments: see the full ranking