Stain Resistant Classic Woven Italian Silk Necktie, vs Perry Ellis Men's Paddon Micro Slim Necktie: which is safer?
Perry Ellis Men's Paddon Micro Slim Necktie is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Brooks Brothers
Stain Resistant Classic Woven Italian Silk Necktie,
PFAS grade
Poor 25/100
Overall grade
Bad 17/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Italian silk with unspecified stain-resistant finish
Confidence
35%
PossibleUndisclosed stain-resistant coating chemistry
PossibleCoating degradation and leaching during care
Our pick
Nano-Tex
Perry Ellis Men's Paddon Micro Slim Necktie
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 53/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
silk or silk-blend woven tie, no water/stain treatment claimed
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes and colorant toxicity
PossibleHeavy metals in pigments
PossibleFragrance allergens or dye transferability
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Undisclosed stain-resistant coating chemistry and Coating degradation and leaching during care on the Brooks Brothers and not on the Nano-Tex.
- We flag Azo dyes and colorant toxicity, Heavy metals in pigments and Fragrance allergens or dye transferability on the Nano-Tex and not on the Brooks Brothers.
- The Brooks Brothers is Italian silk with unspecified stain-resistant finish where the Nano-Tex is silk or silk-blend woven tie, no water/stain treatment claimed, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 40 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Nano-Tex is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Brooks Brothers grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More neckties: see the full ranking