Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food vs Fast Food Wrapping Paper: which is safer?
Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Burger King
Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleGrease-resistant coating migration (non-PFAS components)
ReportedUnknown additive content in vintage coating
PossiblePaper substrate degradation over decades
Burger King
Fast Food Wrapping Paper
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in grease-resistant coating (non-legacy fluorochemicals)
PossibleCoating degradation and leaching during heat or moisture exposure
ReportedUndisclosed chemical additives in coating formulation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Grease-resistant coating migration (non-PFAS components), Unknown additive content in vintage coating, Paper substrate degradation over decades and Formaldehyde-based adhesive or sizing on the Burger King and not on the Burger King.
- We flag PFAS in grease-resistant coating (non-legacy fluorochemicals), Coating degradation and leaching during heat or moisture exposure, Undisclosed chemical additives in coating formulation and Bioaccumulation risk from repeated exposure on the Burger King and not on the Burger King.
- The Burger King is Paper with grease-resistant coating (unspecified) where the Burger King is paper with grease-resistant coating, composition unspecified, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fast-casual food packaging: see the full ranking