Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food vs Chick Fil A - Veggie Wrap w/ Chips and Cookie: which is safer?
Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Burger King
Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleGrease-resistant coating migration (non-PFAS components)
ReportedUnknown additive content in vintage coating
PossiblePaper substrate degradation over decades
Chick-fil-A
Chick Fil A - Veggie Wrap w/ Chips and Cookie
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFluorinated grease-resistant coating (PFAS precursor risk)
PossiblePlastic film/laminate composition unknown
PossibleAdhesive or binding agent leachate
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Grease-resistant coating migration (non-PFAS components), Unknown additive content in vintage coating, Paper substrate degradation over decades and Formaldehyde-based adhesive or sizing on the Burger King and not on the Chick-fil-A.
- We flag Fluorinated grease-resistant coating (PFAS precursor risk), Plastic film/laminate composition unknown and Adhesive or binding agent leachate on the Chick-fil-A and not on the Burger King.
- The Burger King is Paper with grease-resistant coating (unspecified) where the Chick-fil-A is Paper/paperboard with grease-resistant coating (likely fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fast-casual food packaging: see the full ranking