100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown vs (2 pack) Rimmel 100% Waterproof Mascara Duo Pack, 001 Black, 0.27 fl oz: which is safer?
Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown is the clear pick. (2 pack) Rimmel 100% Waterproof Mascara Duo Pack, 001 Black, 0.27 fl oz carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Burt's Bees
100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers
PossibleBacterial growth and contamination in wax formula
Rimmel
(2 pack) Rimmel 100% Waterproof Mascara Duo Pack, 001 Black, 0.27 fl oz
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers
PossibleHeavy metals in pigments
Possible1,4-dioxane (process contaminant)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers and Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula on the Burt's Bees and not on the Rimmel.
- We flag Formaldehyde releasers, Heavy metals in pigments, 1,4-dioxane (process contaminant) and Eye irritation from coating buildup on the Rimmel and not on the Burt's Bees.
- The Burt's Bees is Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base) where the Rimmel is liquid mascara, waterproof formula, unspecified coating agents, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Burt's Bees is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Rimmel grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof mascara, see the full ranking