Suede Splash Lipstick vs M·A·C MAC Macximal Sleek Satin Lipstick: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Burt's Bees
Suede Splash Lipstick
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Wax, oils, pigments, beeswax base
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens (essential oils, fragrance compounds)
PossibleOil rancidity and skin irritation over time
MAC
M·A·C MAC Macximal Sleek Satin Lipstick
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
wax, oils, pigments, talc-based blends
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers
PossibleBacterial or fungal growth (oral contact product)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens (essential oils, fragrance compounds) and Oil rancidity and skin irritation over time on the Burt's Bees and not on the MAC.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers and Bacterial or fungal growth (oral contact product) on the MAC and not on the Burt's Bees.
- The Burt's Bees is Wax, oils, pigments, beeswax base where the MAC is wax, oils, pigments, talc-based blends, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lipstick: see the full ranking