Men's Reserve 2L 3-In-1 Pants vs Men's Powder Town Pants: which is safer?

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Burton Men's Reserve 2L 3-In-1 Pants

Burton

Men's Reserve 2L 3-In-1 Pants

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon/polyester shell with water-repellent coating water-resistant finish

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (fluorinated or non-fluorinated unknown)

PossibleVOC off-gassing from adhesives and coatings

Our pick

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants

Patagonia

Men's Powder Town Pants

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 33/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)

PossibleFormaldehyde-resin finishing agents

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from coating degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (fluorinated or non-fluorinated unknown) and VOC off-gassing from adhesives and coatings on the Burton and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified), Formaldehyde-resin finishing agents and Microfiber shedding from coating degradation on the Patagonia and not on the Burton.
  • The Burton is Nylon/polyester shell with DWR water-resistant finish where the Patagonia is nylon blend with DWR water-repellent treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More snow pants, see the full ranking