Hyaluronic Happikiss vs Lipglass Air Non-Sticky Lip Gloss: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Charlotte Tilbury
Hyaluronic Happikiss
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination
PossibleHeavy metals in synthetic iron oxide or carmine pigments
ReportedContact sensitization from waxes or fragrance compounds
MAC
Lipglass Air Non-Sticky Lip Gloss
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens (undisclosed composition)
Possible1,4-dioxane (cosmetic solvent contaminant)
ReportedBacterial colonization on applicator wand
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane contamination, Heavy metals in synthetic iron oxide or carmine pigments and Contact sensitization from waxes or fragrance compounds on the Charlotte Tilbury and not on the MAC.
- We flag Fragrance allergens (undisclosed composition), 1,4-dioxane (cosmetic solvent contaminant) and Bacterial colonization on applicator wand on the MAC and not on the Charlotte Tilbury.
- The Charlotte Tilbury is Lip tint pigments, humectants, waxes, oils in cosmetic formulation where the MAC is Silicone-based non-sticky gloss formula (typical MAC formulation), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip gloss: see the full ranking