Even Better Makeup vs Pro Full Coverage Foundation: which is safer?

MAC Pro Full Coverage Foundation is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Clinique Even Better Makeup

Clinique

Even Better Makeup

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 43/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (typical liquid foundation/makeup base)

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde-releaser preservatives

ReportedFragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

LikelyApplicator sponge bacterial growth

Our pick

MAC Pro Full Coverage Foundation

MAC

Pro Full Coverage Foundation

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

liquid foundation, pigments, glycerin, emollients

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, mica colorants)

ReportedFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

PossiblePreservative degradation and microbial growth over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde-releaser preservatives, Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components) and Applicator sponge bacterial growth on the Clinique and not on the MAC.
  • We flag Heavy metals in pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, mica colorants), Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components and Preservative degradation and microbial growth over time on the MAC and not on the Clinique.
  • The Clinique is Pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (typical liquid foundation/makeup base) where the MAC is liquid foundation, pigments, glycerin, emollients, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More makeup: see the full ranking