Arch Bay 30 Sleeping Bag vs Wawona Bed Double Sleeping Bag: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Coleman Arch Bay 30 Sleeping Bag

Coleman

Arch Bay 30 Sleeping Bag

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

polyester shell with water-repellent coating

Confidence

45%

LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating

PossiblePolyester fiber shedding and microplastics

PossibleOff-gassing from polyester and finish

The North Face Wawona Bed Double Sleeping Bag

The North Face

Wawona Bed Double Sleeping Bag

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyester shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Confidence

42%

LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

PossibleFormaldehyde or antimicrobial resins in polyester coating

PossibleAzo dyes or heavy metals in polyester dye lots

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in DWR coating, Polyester fiber shedding and microplastics, Off-gassing from polyester and finish and Mold and bacterial growth on the Coleman and not on the The North Face.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR water-repellent finish, Formaldehyde or antimicrobial resins in polyester coating, Azo dyes or heavy metals in polyester dye lots and Microfiber shedding on washing on the The North Face and not on the Coleman.
  • The Coleman is polyester shell with DWR coating where the The North Face is polyester shell with DWR water-repellent finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More sleeping bags: see the full ranking