Women's Bugaboo II Pants vs Men's Powder Town Pants: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Columbia
Women's Bugaboo II Pants
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating chemical composition (non-PFAS assessment)
PossibleNylon fiber microplastic shedding during wear and wash
PossibleFormaldehyde-based fabric finishing resins
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's Powder Town Pants
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)
PossibleFormaldehyde-resin finishing agents
PossibleMicrofiber shedding from coating degradation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating chemical composition (non-PFAS assessment), Nylon fiber microplastic shedding during wear and wash, Formaldehyde-based fabric finishing resins and Coating degradation and reapplication risk on the Columbia and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified), Formaldehyde-resin finishing agents and Microfiber shedding from coating degradation on the Patagonia and not on the Columbia.
- The Columbia is Nylon taffeta with DWR finish where the Patagonia is nylon blend with DWR water-repellent treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More snow pants, see the full ranking