CPC-900 6 Quart High Pressure Multicooker vs Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Cuisinart CPC-900 6 Quart High Pressure Multicooker

Cuisinart

CPC-900 6 Quart High Pressure Multicooker

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Stainless steel inner pot, electric heating base

Confidence

72%

PossiblePressure release valve clogging

PossibleSilicone gasket degradation and odor retention

PossiblePlastic off-gassing (base housing)

Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755

Presto

Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

stainless steel body; no nonstick coating

Confidence

85%

PossibleGasket and sealing material degradation

PossibleStainless steel corrosion and leaching under acidic or salt conditions

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Pressure release valve clogging, Silicone gasket degradation and odor retention and Plastic off-gassing (base housing) on the Cuisinart and not on the Presto.
  • We flag Gasket and sealing material degradation and Stainless steel corrosion and leaching under acidic or salt conditions on the Presto and not on the Cuisinart.
  • The Cuisinart is Stainless steel inner pot, electric heating base where the Presto is stainless steel body; no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More pressure cookers, see the full ranking