Simond 500 Extend Duffel Bag vs Goforth Dry Duffel: which is safer?
Watershed Goforth Dry Duffel is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Decathlon
Simond 500 Extend Duffel Bag
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in water-resistant coating (water-repellent coating)
PossibleAzo dyes in polyester/nylon
PossibleAntimony catalyst residue in polyester
Our pick
Watershed
Goforth Dry Duffel
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and hazardous colorants
PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleResidual processing chemicals (waterproofing treatment)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in water-resistant coating (DWR), Azo dyes in polyester/nylon, Antimony catalyst residue in polyester and Microfiber shedding from coating wear on the Decathlon and not on the Watershed.
- We flag Azo dyes and hazardous colorants, Coating degradation and microparticle shedding and Residual processing chemicals (waterproofing treatment) on the Watershed and not on the Decathlon.
- The Decathlon is Polyester/nylon with water-resistant coating where the Watershed is Naturally textured cotton blend with proprietary waterproofing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Watershed is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Decathlon grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof bags & luggage: see the full ranking