Daily Sun Serum SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen vs Eryfotona Actinica Mineral Sunscreen: which is safer?
Daily Sun Serum SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Derma E
Daily Sun Serum SPF 30 Mineral Sunscreen
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possible1,4-dioxane (non-intentional contaminant from surfactants/emulsifiers)
PossibleFragrance allergens (if fragrance is present)
Isdin
Eryfotona Actinica Mineral Sunscreen
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTitanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles (inhalation risk)
PossiblePreservative or fragrance allergens in the carrier formula
PossibleCoating degradation and separation over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (non-intentional contaminant from surfactants/emulsifiers) and Fragrance allergens (if fragrance is present) on the Derma E and not on the Isdin.
- We flag Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles (inhalation risk), Preservative or fragrance allergens in the carrier formula, Coating degradation and separation over time and PFAS in water-repellent or silicone additives on the Isdin and not on the Derma E.
- The Derma E is Mineral sunscreen, zinc oxide base where the Isdin is mineral filters (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Derma E is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sunscreen, see the full ranking