2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 vs Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock: which is safer?
Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Dickies
2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
100% canvas cotton, uncoated
Confidence
82%
PossibleFormaldehyde resins (fabric sizing and finishing)
Duluth Trading
Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 53/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Cotton canvas apron, no waterproof or stain-resistant coating disclosed
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes and color fugacity
PossibleFormaldehyde in fabric finishing resins
PossibleDust and particulate from worn fabric
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Formaldehyde resins (fabric sizing and finishing) on the Dickies and not on the Duluth Trading.
- We flag Azo dyes and color fugacity, Formaldehyde in fabric finishing resins and Dust and particulate from worn fabric on the Duluth Trading and not on the Dickies.
- The Dickies is 100% canvas cotton, uncoated where the Duluth Trading is Cotton canvas apron, no waterproof or stain-resistant coating disclosed, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More work aprons, see the full ranking