Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Gap Boys' Kids Pique Polo: which is safer?

Gap Boys' Kids Pique Polo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Our pick

Gap Boys' Kids Pique Polo

Gap Kids

Gap Boys' Kids Pique Polo

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

cotton pique knit

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins (finish treatment)

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant heavy metals

PossibleResidual processing chemicals (de-sizing, bleaching)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Gap Kids.
  • We flag Formaldehyde resins (finish treatment), Azo dyes and colorant heavy metals and Residual processing chemicals (de-sizing, bleaching) on the Gap Kids and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Gap Kids is cotton pique knit, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking