Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Girls' Uniform Polo Shirt Shirt by Gap: which is safer?
Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Dickies
Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and colorants
PossibleAntimony in polyester
PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments
Gap Kids
Girls' Uniform Polo Shirt Shirt by Gap
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes
PossibleResidual pesticides in cotton
PossibleAntimony in polyester content (if blended)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Gap Kids.
- We flag Azo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes, Residual pesticides in cotton, Antimony in polyester content (if blended) and Microfiber shedding during wash on the Gap Kids and not on the Dickies.
- The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Gap Kids is cotton/cotton blend polo shirt, untreated, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More school uniforms, see the full ranking