Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Girls' Uniform Polo Shirt Shirt by Gap: which is safer?

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Girls' Uniform Polo Shirt Shirt by Gap

Gap Kids

Girls' Uniform Polo Shirt Shirt by Gap

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 43/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/cotton blend polo shirt, untreated

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes

PossibleResidual pesticides in cotton

PossibleAntimony in polyester content (if blended)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Gap Kids.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes, Residual pesticides in cotton, Antimony in polyester content (if blended) and Microfiber shedding during wash on the Gap Kids and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Gap Kids is cotton/cotton blend polo shirt, untreated, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking