Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Boys Stretch Jersey Polo Shirt: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Polo Ralph Lauren Boys Stretch Jersey Polo Shirt

Polo Ralph Lauren

Boys Stretch Jersey Polo Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton jersey blend, stretch

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant heavy metals

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finishing

PossibleAllergic sensitization from synthetic dyes or finishes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Polo Ralph Lauren.
  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant heavy metals, Formaldehyde resins in finishing, Allergic sensitization from synthetic dyes or finishes and Microfiber shedding from elastane on the Polo Ralph Lauren and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Polo Ralph Lauren is cotton jersey blend, stretch, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking