Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Boys Uniform Polo: which is safer?

Nautica Boys Uniform Polo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Our pick

Nautica Boys Uniform Polo

Nautica

Boys Uniform Polo

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

100% cotton pique

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (wrinkle-resistance finishes)

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy-metal mordants

PossibleFormaldehyde in dye carriers or fabric treatments

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Nautica.
  • We flag Formaldehyde releasers (wrinkle-resistance finishes), Azo dyes and heavy-metal mordants and Formaldehyde in dye carriers or fabric treatments on the Nautica and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Nautica is 100% cotton pique, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking