Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Uniform Stretch Twill Shorts Boys 8-20: which is safer?
Nautica Uniform Stretch Twill Shorts Boys 8-20 is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Dickies
Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Poor 49/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes and colorants
PossibleAntimony in polyester
PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments
Our pick
Nautica
Uniform Stretch Twill Shorts Boys 8-20
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 53/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
cotton/polyester twill, stretch blend
Confidence
68%
PossibleAzo dyes and colorfast potential
PossibleAntimony in polyester
PossibleLoose synthetic fibers and microfiber shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Nautica.
- We flag Azo dyes and colorfast potential and Loose synthetic fibers and microfiber shedding on the Nautica and not on the Dickies.
- Both carry a flag for Antimony in polyester, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Nautica is cotton/polyester twill, stretch blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More school uniforms, see the full ranking