Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Kids' School Uniform Polo Shirt 3-Pack: which is safer?

Old Navy Kids' School Uniform Polo Shirt 3-Pack is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Our pick

Old Navy Kids' School Uniform Polo Shirt 3-Pack

Old Navy

Kids' School Uniform Polo Shirt 3-Pack

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

cotton blend knit polo shirt, no stated water or stain treatment

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and excess dye residue

PossibleFormaldehyde in fabric finishing resins

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from polyester component

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Old Navy.
  • We flag Azo dyes and excess dye residue, Formaldehyde in fabric finishing resins and Microfiber shedding from polyester component on the Old Navy and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Old Navy is cotton blend knit polo shirt, no stated water or stain treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking