Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs George Girls School Uniform Flat Front Pants: which is safer?

George Girls School Uniform Flat Front Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

Dickies

Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments

Our pick

George Girls School Uniform Flat Front Pants

School Apparel

George Girls School Uniform Flat Front Pants

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

cotton/polyester blend, flat front pants

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant residues

PossibleFormaldehyde finishing resins

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from polyester blend

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the School Apparel.
  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant residues, Formaldehyde finishing resins and Microfiber shedding from polyester blend on the School Apparel and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the School Apparel is cotton/polyester blend, flat front pants, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More school uniforms, see the full ranking