Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant vs Port Authority Men's Easy Care Shirt Long Sleeve: which is safer?
Dickies Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Dickies
Boys Classic Fit Flat Front Pant
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Poor 49/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes and colorants
PossibleAntimony in polyester
PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments
Sears
Port Authority Men's Easy Care Shirt Long Sleeve
PFAS grade
Poor 25/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
cotton blend with stain/wrinkle-resistant treatment
Confidence
35%
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers in durable-press resin
LikelyPFAS in stain-resistant coating
PossibleAzo dyes (if dark-colored)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and colorants, Antimony in polyester, Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Residual solvents or sizing agents on the Dickies and not on the Sears.
- We flag Formaldehyde releasers in durable-press resin, PFAS in stain-resistant coating, Azo dyes (if dark-colored) and Coating degradation and particulate shedding on the Sears and not on the Dickies.
- The Dickies is cotton/polyester blend, no special coatings where the Sears is cotton blend with stain/wrinkle-resistant treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 40 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Dickies is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Sears grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More school uniforms, see the full ranking