Men's Sports Cushions Shock Absorbing Shoe Inserts vs Pulse Performance Insoles: which is safer?

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dr. Scholl's Men's Sports Cushions Shock Absorbing Shoe Inserts

Dr. Scholl's

Men's Sports Cushions Shock Absorbing Shoe Inserts

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

foam cushioning, likely polyurethane or EVA

Confidence

72%

PossibleAdhesive or bonding agent degradation

PossibleOdor and microbial growth in degraded foam

PossibleContact dermatitis from dyes or finishes

Our pick

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles

Powerstep

Pulse Performance Insoles

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

EVA foam, gel, fabric blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in fabric blend

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Adhesive or bonding agent degradation, Odor and microbial growth in degraded foam and Contact dermatitis from dyes or finishes on the Dr. Scholl's and not on the Powerstep.
  • We flag Azo dyes in fabric blend and Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing on the Powerstep and not on the Dr. Scholl's.
  • The Dr. Scholl's is foam cushioning, likely polyurethane or EVA where the Powerstep is EVA foam, gel, fabric blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking