Performance Sized to Fit Running Insoles vs Pulse Performance Insoles: which is safer?

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dr. Scholl's Performance Sized to Fit Running Insoles

Dr. Scholl's

Performance Sized to Fit Running Insoles

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

foam cushioning with durable topcoat finish

Confidence

55%

PossibleCoating leachates (fluorinated or non-fluorinated polymers)

PossiblePolyurethane foam degradation and isocyanate residues

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing

Our pick

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles

Powerstep

Pulse Performance Insoles

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

EVA foam, gel, fabric blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in fabric blend

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating leachates (fluorinated or non-fluorinated polymers), Polyurethane foam degradation and isocyanate residues, Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing and Bacterial or fungal growth from moisture retention on the Dr. Scholl's and not on the Powerstep.
  • We flag Azo dyes in fabric blend and Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing on the Powerstep and not on the Dr. Scholl's.
  • The Dr. Scholl's is foam cushioning with durable topcoat finish where the Powerstep is EVA foam, gel, fabric blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Powerstep is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking