n1150500 Hermetic Jar vs Lunch Food Box: which is safer?

Klean Kanteen Lunch Food Box is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Emsa n1150500 Hermetic Jar

Emsa

n1150500 Hermetic Jar

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 62/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

glass jar, plastic lid (polypropylene/polystyrene)

Confidence

78%

PossibleGasket material degradation and microbial contamination

PossibleGlass fracture and contamination from fragments

Our pick

Klean Kanteen Lunch Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Lunch Food Box

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

stainless steel with bamboo fiber lid

Confidence

78%

PossibleBamboo fiber lid degradation or contaminant absorption

PossibleGasket or seal material composition

PossibleBamboo fiber formaldehyde or chemical treatment residue

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Gasket material degradation and microbial contamination and Glass fracture and contamination from fragments on the Emsa and not on the Klean Kanteen.
  • We flag Bamboo fiber lid degradation or contaminant absorption, Gasket or seal material composition and Bamboo fiber formaldehyde or chemical treatment residue on the Klean Kanteen and not on the Emsa.
  • The Emsa is glass jar, plastic lid (polypropylene/polystyrene) where the Klean Kanteen is stainless steel with bamboo fiber lid, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Klean Kanteen is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More lunch boxes & food containers: see the full ranking