{lot Of 68 Watches}epson Pulsense Watch Ps-500 Heart Rate Activity vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?
{lot Of 68 Watches}epson Pulsense Watch Ps-500 Heart Rate Activity is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Epson
{lot Of 68 Watches}epson Pulsense Watch Ps-500 Heart Rate Activity
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePolycarbonate BPA leaching (heat/solvent exposure)
PossibleSilicone band degradation and skin contact
PossibleBacterial growth in band material (moisture trap)
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Polycarbonate BPA leaching (heat/solvent exposure), Silicone band degradation and skin contact and Bacterial growth in band material (moisture trap) on the Epson and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Epson.
- The Epson is Silicone band, polycarbonate/resin case where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Epson grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking