Ceratal Evo Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan vs Stainless Clad Fry Pan: which is safer?

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. Fissler Ceratal Evo Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Fissler Ceratal Evo Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan

Fissler

Ceratal Evo Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Ceramic non-stick coating

Confidence

72%

LikelyCoating degradation and substrate exposure

PossibleAluminum leaching from substrate

PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing during curing

Our pick

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating

Confidence

90%

PossibleClad separation or delamination over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and substrate exposure, Aluminum leaching from substrate and Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing during curing on the Fissler and not on the Made In.
  • We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Fissler.
  • The Fissler is Ceramic non-stick coating where the Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware, see the full ranking