Folex vs Waterproofing Wax for Leather: which is safer?
Folex edges it on pure PFAS risk, but Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather wins overall once other hazards are counted.
Folex
Folex
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) and propellant inhalation risk
PossibleSurfactant-induced skin irritation or dermatitis
ReportedIngredient opacity and unlabeled additives
Our pick
Nikwax
Waterproofing Wax for Leather
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleRespiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application
ReportedPFAS in water repellency treatment
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and propellant inhalation risk, Surfactant-induced skin irritation or dermatitis, Ingredient opacity and unlabeled additives and PFAS accumulation in treated textiles on the Folex and not on the Nikwax.
- We flag Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application and PFAS in water repellency treatment on the Nikwax and not on the Folex.
- The Folex is unclear; likely surfactant-based where the Nikwax is wax-based waterproofing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- We are less certain about the Folex grade, at 25% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fabric stain guard sprays, see the full ranking