Men's Explorist HR Gen 4 Smartwatch vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?

X-Doria Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Fossil Men's Explorist HR Gen 4 Smartwatch

Fossil

Men's Explorist HR Gen 4 Smartwatch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Stainless steel case

Confidence

35%

PossibleNickel dermal sensitization from stainless steel contact

LikelyBattery and electrical hazard

ReportedSilicone or elastomer band degradation

Our pick

X-Doria Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

X-Doria

Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel, magnetic closure

Confidence

82%

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Nickel dermal sensitization from stainless steel contact, Battery and electrical hazard, Silicone or elastomer band degradation and Mineral crystal glass degradation and splinter risk on the Fossil and not on the X-Doria.
  • We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Fossil.
  • The Fossil is Stainless steel case where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Fossil grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking