Grangers Tent + Gear Repel UV Spray vs Waterproofing Wax for Leather: which is safer?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Grangers Tent + Gear Repel UV Spray

Granger's

Grangers Tent + Gear Repel UV Spray

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Bad 10/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

UV-blocking spray treatment on textiles/gear

Confidence

42%

LikelyPFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals")

PossibleInhalation exposure during application

PossibleSkin sensitization from residual spray or wet fabric contact

Our pick

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 51/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

wax-based waterproofing

Confidence

78%

PossibleRespiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

ReportedPFAS in water repellency treatment

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), Inhalation exposure during application, Skin sensitization from residual spray or wet fabric contact and Off-gassing from wet-applied coating on the Granger's and not on the Nikwax.
  • We flag Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application and PFAS in water repellency treatment on the Nikwax and not on the Granger's.
  • The Granger's is UV-blocking spray treatment on textiles/gear where the Nikwax is wax-based waterproofing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Nikwax is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Granger's grade, at 42% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fabric stain guard sprays: see the full ranking