Slow Cooking Liners vs Dining Collection Slow Cooker Liner 10 ct: which is safer?
Slow Cooking Liners is the clear pick. Dining Collection Slow Cooker Liner 10 ct carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
If You Care
Slow Cooking Liners
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleThermal degradation and smoke at high heat
PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp
PossibleAdhesion failure and paper fragments in food
Kroger
Dining Collection Slow Cooker Liner 10 ct
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-family coating coatings (non-PFAS-specific leaching)
PossibleBPA and BPS in plastic base
PossiblePhthalate plasticizers
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Thermal degradation and smoke at high heat, Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp and Adhesion failure and paper fragments in food on the If You Care and not on the Kroger.
- We flag Fluoropolymer coatings (non-PFAS-specific leaching), BPA and BPS in plastic base, Phthalate plasticizers and Adhesive and release-agent residues on the Kroger and not on the If You Care.
- The If You Care is Unbleached parchment paper where the Kroger is Plastic slow cooker liners (composition unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the If You Care is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Kroger grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More slow cooker liners: see the full ranking