Slow Cooking Liners vs (2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count: which is safer?

Slow Cooking Liners is the clear pick. (2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Slow Cooking Liners

If You Care

Slow Cooking Liners

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Unbleached parchment paper

Confidence

78%

PossibleThermal degradation and smoke at high heat

PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp

PossibleAdhesion failure and paper fragments in food

(2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count

Reynolds

(2 pack) Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners, Small (1-3 quart), 5 Count

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

analysis pending

Verdict

pending

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

polyethylene/plastic liner

Confidence

72%

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Thermal degradation and smoke at high heat, Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp and Adhesion failure and paper fragments in food on the If You Care and not on the Reynolds.
  • The If You Care is Unbleached parchment paper where the Reynolds is polyethylene/plastic liner, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the If You Care is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More slow cooker liners: see the full ranking