12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker vs JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Instant Pot 12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker

Instant Pot

12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating

Confidence

82%

PossibleStainless steel corrosion and metal leaching

PossibleSilicone gasket degradation and off-gassing

PossibleBacterial growth in water reservoir or seal cavities

TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer

Tiger

JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements

Confidence

72%

PossibleMineral and microbial buildup in heating element

PossibleStainless steel corrosion and iron leaching

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Stainless steel corrosion and metal leaching, Silicone gasket degradation and off-gassing and Bacterial growth in water reservoir or seal cavities on the Instant Pot and not on the Tiger.
  • We flag Mineral and microbial buildup in heating element and Stainless steel corrosion and iron leaching on the Tiger and not on the Instant Pot.
  • The Instant Pot is Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating where the Tiger is Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More rice cookers, see the full ranking