TX5 GTX Men's vs Women's Fastpack Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots: which is safer?

The North Face Women's Fastpack Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

La Sportiva TX5 GTX Men's

La Sportiva

TX5 GTX Men's

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

synthetic textile with Gore-Tex membrane waterproof layer

Confidence

45%

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing

PossibleAntimony in polyester

Our pick

The North Face Women's Fastpack Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots

The North Face

Women's Fastpack Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Synthetic upper (likely nylon/polyester blend) with water-repellent coating waterproof treatment, rubber/synthetic sole

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating (reported in category, not confirmed for this product)

PossibleAdhesive off-gassing (if present in midsole/sole bonding)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes, Formaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing and Antimony in polyester on the La Sportiva and not on the The North Face.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR coating (reported in category, not confirmed for this product) and Adhesive off-gassing (if present in midsole/sole bonding) on the The North Face and not on the La Sportiva.
  • The La Sportiva is synthetic textile with Gore-Tex membrane waterproof layer where the The North Face is Synthetic upper (likely nylon/polyester blend) with DWR waterproof treatment, rubber/synthetic sole, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof boots: see the full ranking