Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon vs Wusthof Gourmet Hollow Edge Santoku Knife: which is safer?
Le Creuset Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Le Creuset
Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
silicone (no nonstick coating)
Confidence
82%
PossibleSilicone polymer degradation at high heat
PossibleBacterial growth in crevices or degraded material
Wüsthof
Wusthof Gourmet Hollow Edge Santoku Knife
PFAS grade
Poor 35/100
Overall grade
Poor 31/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
stainless steel blade, no nonstick coating
Confidence
82%
PossibleSurface corrosion and pitting (foodborne pathogen harboring)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Silicone polymer degradation at high heat and Bacterial growth in crevices or degraded material on the Le Creuset and not on the Wüsthof.
- We flag Surface corrosion and pitting (foodborne pathogen harboring) on the Wüsthof and not on the Le Creuset.
- The Le Creuset is silicone (no nonstick coating) where the Wüsthof is stainless steel blade, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Le Creuset is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More non-stick kitchen gadgets: see the full ranking