Men's 501 Original Thermodapt Jeans vs Women's Slim Work Denim Pants: which is safer?

Levi's Men's 501 Original Thermodapt Jeans is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Levi's Men's 501 Original Thermodapt Jeans

Levi's

Men's 501 Original Thermodapt Jeans

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

100% cotton denim, no disclosed water-resistant treatment

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness

PossibleFormaldehyde residues from finishing

PossibleDegradation and microfiber shedding

Patagonia Women's Slim Work Denim Pants

Patagonia

Women's Slim Work Denim Pants

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton-blend denim (no stated water-repellent or stain treatment)

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde-release resins (sizing and finishes)

PossibleAntimony in polyester blend components

ReportedMicroplastic shedding during wash

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, Formaldehyde residues from finishing and Degradation and microfiber shedding on the Levi's and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Formaldehyde-release resins (sizing and finishes), Antimony in polyester blend components and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Levi's.
  • The Levi's is 100% cotton denim, no disclosed water-resistant treatment where the Patagonia is Cotton-blend denim (no stated water-repellent or stain treatment), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More stain-resistant jeans: see the full ranking