Washable Period Underwear vs Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear: which is safer?
Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear is the clear pick. LOLA Washable Period Underwear carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Lola
Washable Period Underwear
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleWater-resistant coating chemistry (unspecified)
PossiblePesticide residues in cotton (if non-organic)
PossibleSynthetic fiber blend degradation
Our pick
Ruby Love
Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleBacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Water-resistant coating chemistry (unspecified), Pesticide residues in cotton (if non-organic) and Synthetic fiber blend degradation on the Lola and not on the Ruby Love.
- We flag Coating degradation and microparticle shedding and Bacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored on the Ruby Love and not on the Lola.
- The Lola is Cotton blend with water-resistant treatment where the Ruby Love is organic cotton, waterproof backing layer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ruby Love is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More period underwear, see the full ranking