The Lola High Waist Period Underwear vs Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear: which is safer?

Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear is the clear pick. The Lola High Waist Period Underwear carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

PFAS grade

Good 50/100

Overall grade

Poor 42/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

Confidence

82%

PossibleUndisclosed water-repellent treatment chemistry

PossibleSkin irritation or allergic reaction to treatment

Our pick

Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear

Ruby Love

Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton, waterproof backing layer

Confidence

82%

PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle shedding

PossibleBacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Undisclosed water-repellent treatment chemistry and Skin irritation or allergic reaction to treatment on the Lola and not on the Ruby Love.
  • We flag Coating degradation and microparticle shedding and Bacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored on the Ruby Love and not on the Lola.
  • The Lola is organic cotton with water-resistant treatment where the Ruby Love is organic cotton, waterproof backing layer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 50 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ruby Love is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More period underwear, see the full ranking